Adam Jasinski

I help leadership teams turn AI strategy into deployed, governed, production-grade capability.

Most organisations have an AI strategy. Most have engineering teams. Very few have someone who can hold both conversations fluently, translating board-level intent into architecture decisions, and engineering reality back into strategic clarity. That is the gap I fill.

I have spent 14 years building, selling, and governing enterprise technology across defence, finance, telecommunications, and UK government. I have been a Technical Director who led a consultancy through a £20M acquisition. I have closed £2.5M in sales at 100% conversion. I have designed governance frameworks for GDS and built open-source infrastructure for multi-agent AI systems. I sit on the advisory boards of two AI companies, and I am completing an MSc in AI Systems Engineering at the University of Bath.

I work with a small number of leadership teams, CAIOs, CTOs, CIOs, and CDIOs, where the real constraint is not ambition. It is the gap between ambition and execution.

Proof Points

  • Technical Director at Automation Logic, led the consultancy from ~£6M to £13M revenue, 74% margins, through a £20M acquisition
  • £2.5M in closed sales at 100% conversion rate
  • 14+ years in enterprise architecture across defence, financial services, telecommunications, and UK government
  • Managing Consultant at Capgemini Invent, Digital Architecture practice, current engagements include AI governance and security for GDS
  • Advisory board member for two AI companies (A2A Net, an agentic AI marketplace; Kora Intelligence, a marketing AI agent platform)
  • Creator of AIMux, an open-source agentic AI service mesh for multi-agent observability, routing, and governance
  • MSc AI Systems Engineering, University of Bath (in progress, expected August 2027)

How I work with leadership teams

Strategy & Governance

I design AI operating models, governance frameworks, and investment cases that give leadership teams clear decision rights and measurable controls, not policy documents that sit on a shelf.

The governance question is not whether controls exist. It is whether controls are executable inside delivery workflows. I build governance that accelerates rather than blocks: risk tiers tied to concrete technical measures, time-boxed evidence-based approvals, and post-deployment monitoring built into the operating model from day one.

This is the door I typically walk through with a new client. Policy work reveals engineering gaps. Engineering work reveals governance gaps. Each feeds the other.

Example deliverables: AI strategy and operating model design. Governance frameworks for regulated environments. Board-ready investment cases. Risk and assurance models. AI maturity assessments. DPIA-style assessments for AI systems.

Architecture & Engineering

I design and build systems that actually run in production. My work spans the full stack, from reference architectures and agentic service mesh patterns to secure deployment, zero-trust networking, and observability, so that strategy decisions have a concrete technical path.

Most AI strategies fail for the same reason: they are designed as documents, not systems. If strategy is written without architecture constraints, it drifts into abstraction. If architecture is designed without governance posture, it slows into compliance theatre. I keep both coupled.

My engineering credibility is what differentiates me from the policy shops. I have built the systems I advise on. AIMux, my open-source agentic AI service mesh, applies service mesh principles to autonomous agent workflows: lightweight sidecars providing mTLS identity, a gateway routing on metadata headers while treating payloads as opaque, and a detect-wrap-unwrap pattern designed for protocol agnosticism and zero-trust security.

Example deliverables: Reference architectures for agentic AI. Multi-agent platform design. Security and observability patterns. Zero-trust architecture for AI systems. Technical due diligence. Architecture assurance reviews.

Executive & Investment Advisory

I translate technical complexity into strategic decisions. I advise senior leaders and investors on AI platform bets, build-vs-buy trade-offs, and operating model shifts, bringing engineering credibility into rooms where it is usually absent.

The people buying AI advisory right now, CAIOs and CDIOs, are in roles new enough that they do not have established supplier relationships yet. They have not defaulted to call Deloitte. They are actively looking for someone who understands their specific problem: how to deploy autonomous AI responsibly, at scale, without defaulting to block everything until we understand it.

I offer both branches under one roof. The policy branch, governance frameworks, risk taxonomies, assurance models, board-ready AI strategies, is what gets me in the door. The executive branch, reference architectures, secure implementation, technical assurance, is what makes the CTO trust me, and what turns a one-off sprint into an ongoing relationship.

Example deliverables: Technical advisory for AI investments. Platform strategy reviews. M&A technical diligence. Executive education and briefings. Build-vs-buy analysis.

Featured Work

View all work

January 2026

AIMux

Open-source agentic AI service mesh — infrastructure for observability, routing, and governance in multi-agent systems.

Agentic AI
Architecture
Open Source

November 2025

Enterprise AI Governance Framework

Advisory and framework design for enterprise AI controls, decision rights, and assurance models in regulated environments.

AI Governance
Strategy
Public Sector

Latest Writing

Read all writing →

Let's talk

I work with leadership teams navigating complex AI decisions, where the gap between strategy and execution is the real constraint. If that sounds familiar, I'd welcome a conversation.

jasinski@hotmail.co.uk